Why Evolution is True
This was written on April 15, 2009 by trisha garvey filed under news_and_business

As an astronomer, my familiarity with the details of biological evolution are about on par with that of an interested layman (though being trained scientifically helps with that understanding, adding insight to the process of the scientific endeavor). I’m familiar with the concepts of descent with modification, genetic mutations, natural pressures for adaptations, and the like. I’m less familiar with other aspects, like allele frequencies, how specifically pressures can change adaptations, and what transitional fossils are in the record, but I can probably hold my own against your run-of-the-mill creationist....

Discussion

Janette Jim April 15, 2009 6:18 PM
Yup i believe in evolution, just think about it and youll eventually find something to belive in
dj traumatix (hitek fx) April 17, 2009 09:07 AM
evolution is true in terms of changing within species. evolution doesn't make sense in that species even change. even darwin's finches showed changes within species and not changes from species to species. there is a lot more evidence supporting creation than evolution. take the cambrian explosion for instance. also what about physics? the second law of thermodynamics and entropy? randomness increases as time moves forward. i find that biologists are easy to be swayed by the evolution theory, and physicists are more inclined to say that there was a beginning. evolution is bad science. a lot of things were fudged to have the public believe in it. even einstein admitted he made a mistake when he added a fudge factor to his universal equations that actually pointed to a beginning in the universe.
Eddie Sosa May 01, 2009 12:40 AM
wow.. umm. wait, what? start over again, please!

Article Stats

  •  
    Page View
    Bumps
    Comments
  • Total
    51
    3
    3
Discover what the world is thinking
About Us | Contact Us
Copyright © 2009 Bumpley LLC. All rights reserved | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy